<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Jed Report - Latest Comments in New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://jedreport.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://jedreport.disqus.com/new_obama_ad_no_maverick/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:46:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2247495</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jed - just a thought:  would it be feasible to add a line in your SarahSixPack clock for the number of "Puff Pieces" she does.  &lt;br&gt;Calling the CharlieSukkup thing an "interview" is kind of a stretch.  I'd hate to see you even dignify it with a "1" by that word "interview"....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How about a line that has "Oprah Puff Pieces: 1" or "National Enquirer Pieces: 1"&lt;br&gt;Real Interviews:  0&lt;br&gt;Photo Ops:  Too numerous to count&lt;br&gt;Press Conferences: 0&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Love this ad.  Especially the Big Bad Texas John Cronyn music.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">soithoni</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:46:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2240986</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Won't lauch from TJR, but was able to launch it from YouTube.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;More of the same, BO Campaign!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cybergal619</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:29:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2239924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The democrats need to fight back harder, if they dig deeply they will find stuff as to why McPalin doesn't want to talk to the media b'cos of the can of worms that might be opened, found this on this site &lt;a href="http://www.laprogressive.com/2008/09/03/about-sarah-palin/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.laprogressive.com/2008/09/03/about-sarah-palin/"&gt;http://www.laprogressive.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Comment by Barbara Learmonth &lt;br&gt;2008-09-06 09:56:54 &lt;br&gt;As a long-time Alaska state employee, I know that much of what Anne says about Palin is true, and I find the rest credible. I would add that salaries for rank and file state employees in Alaska are so low that many workers rely on 2nd jobs and/or federally funded assistance (food stamps, Medicaid, public housing) to support their families. My friend quit the state after 14 years and went to work for WalMart because they pay her better and treat her better. Staff morale is disintegrating. Many state jobs go unfilled for months or years because of poor pay. Some retirees are hired back into their old positions because the state cannot attract qualified younger candidates. But this spring, despite huge state surpluses due to rising oil prices, Palin opposed efforts to bring state salaries in line with cost of living increases&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If only the MSM will be bold enough to do their work&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Linton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:50:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2239691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Finally.  I've been waiting for the day that the campaign started using the L word and applying it to McCain and his Republican allies.  "Misleading", "Making stuff up", "not being truthful", "Misrepresenting" don't have the same effect that calling somebody a LIAR does.  Now, if all the Obama surrogates can just start calling McCain/Palin liars and making it stick in the media....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SeattleAJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:28:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2239199</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually this is not a game!  This is an election where FAILURE IS NOT AN OPTION for the Democrats!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cyndi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:39:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2239184</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Obama campaign needs to roll out ads daily if required.  Game on!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cyndi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:38:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238954</link><description>&lt;p&gt;eclecticbrotha,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Along those lines....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.politicalcartoons.com/cartoon/6a692238-0fa1-4dec-952b-06dc92c4a6ab.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.politicalcartoons.com/cartoon/6a692238-0fa1-4dec-952b-06dc92c4a6ab.html"&gt;http://www.politicalcartoon...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Alaskans 4 Obama"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/2008/09/alaskans_for_ob/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/2008/09/alaskans_for_ob/"&gt;http://www.thewashingtonnot...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ezpz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:14:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238947</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How about we just use   ' McLie / Palie ' ?&lt;br&gt;(I know, could roll more..)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">motu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:14:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238907</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yea! What's up with that? Can they slander &amp;amp; lie with absolute immunity?? Why? (except that its politics as usual...)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">motu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:10:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238893</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yup, February,  we need more of Rendell!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://digg.com/politics/Rendell_If_I_Was_Palin_You_d_Be_Calling_For_My_impeachment" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://digg.com/politics/Rendell_If_I_Was_Palin_You_d_Be_Calling_For_My_impeachment"&gt;http://digg.com/politics/Re...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Rendell: If I Was Palin You'd Be Calling For My impeachment&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ezpz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:09:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238757</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh snap. Obama just called Palin a "moose shooter." Too funny.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eclecticbrotha</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:57:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238740</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ya hooo!  I don't care how dorky that sounds, I love this ad.  Play it on the weather channel were everyone is watching Ike in this part of the country!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MaryE</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:55:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Republicans, he added, "would make the all time all-star team for spiders the way they can spin.&lt;br&gt;Ed Rendell, PA&lt;br&gt;"&lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/08/rendell-if-i-was-palin-yo_n_124879.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/08/rendell-if-i-was-palin-yo_n_124879.html"&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">February</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:54:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238669</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh, Jed, I don't know if you've seen the latest in Bury Brigade antics. They're reporting on Digg that "some" of the users complained that an article featuring Palin's "first gaffe" is inaccurate. The message is posted at the top of the page in red letters. Yet, when you click the link, there's a video right there of her saying that Fannie and Freddie were a burden on taxpayers. Well, they will be NOW, but that's besides the point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In my view, Digg is now apart of the covert cabal attempting to undermine us all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That warning wasn't there when I sent it out to people this morning. I only found out about it by someone I sent the link to telling me that the story may have been fake.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lexamich</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:48:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238528</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, Sean, I caught the good news earlier. Rest assured they won't stop trying but its great news so far.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eclecticbrotha</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:38:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;eclecticbrotha said earlier today that he thinks Obama needs to do BIG RALLIES everywhere he goes once again. I agree completely. Hillary and McCain mocked him previously about his big events only because they were jealous that they couldn't draw a big audience themselves. (In New Hampshire, Hillary had to haul in supporters from NY to fill High School gyms, even.) Now McCain is drawing bigger crowds who come to see Sarah, showing off his own "celebrity" ego.. Obama needs to show them how (effortlessly) it's really done. Besides, he draws energy from big crowds and the media can't resist but cover his big events in their entirety.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If anyone from the Obama camp reads this - do it. Do HUGE events everywhere you go until election day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RandyH</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:28:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238332</link><description>&lt;p&gt;EB -- i'm right there with you brotha!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jed Lewison</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:24:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238333</link><description>&lt;p&gt;eclecticbrotha,&lt;br&gt;Here is more good news.  Three weeks and we migh have our October suprise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/08/sarah-palin-troopergate-r_n_124881.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/08/sarah-palin-troopergate-r_n_124881.html"&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:24:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238297</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hillary's taking her shots at the GOP right now in Florida. &lt;a href="http://CNN.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="CNN.com"&gt;CNN.com&lt;/a&gt; is carrying it live.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well, it just ended but I must say the blue pant suited lady gave me chills. She did a great job.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I just switched to the other feed of Barack in Farmington Hills, MI. Sounds like there's a little more boom in his voice today.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eclecticbrotha</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:22:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238267</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Think Progress is counting how many times she LIES about the Bridge To Nowhere...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/09/08/lies-nowhere/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/09/08/lies-nowhere/"&gt;http://thinkprogress.org/20...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RandyH</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:19:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238253</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great ad. Keep em coming. I want a new one - like this and even more aggressive - every day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nepat</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:18:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238242</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jed, Joan Walsh is a Clintonista praying Obama loses so she can yell "I told you so!" at the top of her lungs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way, am I the only only who senses this is gonna be a kickass day for the Obama campaign? The surrogates are all on the coordinated attack. Obama is on fire in his Flint appearance then flattens McCain with the "No Maverick" ad. In less than 2 hours we get the double barrel barrage of Keith O. and Rachel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm feeling much more energized than I was this weekend.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eclecticbrotha</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:17:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238213</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed, great ad and they do need to make sure they say for it until she had to pay for it.  I think this is the main thing Obama needs to do.  Instead of attacking palin directly, he needs to group McCain and Palin together and attack the Maverick and Change message they are trying to spew.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:15:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238206</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, Jed. &lt;br&gt;And I think she's the only non Republican? &lt;br&gt;I'm not even sure about  that.  I just assumed so because she's from Salon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Okay, now that Rachel has her own show and is not on David's Race for the WH, I can put RFTWH on the "do not watch" list.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Doggie and I are off for a  walk.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;:)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ezpz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:14:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Obama Ad: "No Maverick"</title><link>http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/new-obama-ad-no-maverick.html#comment-2238175</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They just need to keep rolling out ads like this one-after-another.  Well done, and hopefully effective.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jallenrule</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:12:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>